How we verify records
Each submission is checked against rules and evidence. No shortcuts, approval without review or invented results. Past decisions remain as recorded.
- 1📋Clear rules
Every challenge publishes what is allowed, what is measured, what evidence is needed and the minimum result. No record without rules set in advance.
- 2🎬Evidence
The participant submits a continuous video of the attempt, confirms its legality and safety, and lists witnesses. Without evidence, there is no review.
- 3✦Herzl review
Herzl, an AI judge, reviews each submission against the rules and evidence and reaches a reasoned decision.
- 4👤Human escalation when needed
Unclear cases, uncertain evidence and safety risks go to a qualified human judge who requests more information where needed.
- 5🖊️Reasoned decision
An authorized reviewer records approval, rejection or a request for more evidence, together with the reason and reviewer identity.
- 6🏆The record is entered
Only after documented approval does a record enter the database and receive an official identifier and digital certificate. Its history remains even after the record is broken.
What else matters
- No sample results.
Every number, record and profile comes from actual submissions. Empty places stay empty.
- History stays visible.
A broken record remains in the archive, together with a reasoned decision.
- Safety comes first.
Challenges are classified by risk and age. Dangerous challenges are not published, and attempts that put people at risk or break the law are rejected.